Problem and goal statement

Maintenance was unpredictable because of an aging fleet, non-centralized part acquisition, and different crew procedures for resourcing and tracking work. The goal was to establish a streamlined maintenance workflow, increase shop stock two-fold, reduce average non-mission-capable time by 50%, and define what belonged in GCSS-Army versus the Vessel Support Office.

Current Process Map: VSO Actions

A map of the maintenance request process from vessel notification through VSO routing, section action, completion, and customer notification. Identifying current value-added, non-value-added required, and non-value-added steps.

SIPOC map showing suppliers, inputs, VSO process, outputs, and vessel customers
Source artifact 01 / SIPOC developed with the project team
Current-state VSO action process map with value-added and non-value-added steps
Source artifact 02 / Current-state process map

Increase shop stock and decrease NMC time

Develop a streamlined maintenance workflow chart that clearly defines the road maps for maintenance challenges. Increase shop stock two-fold while decreasing average non-mission-capable time by 50% and sustaining a higher operational readiness rate.

Army regulation does not outline logistics support actions for watercraft.

This fishbone analysis covered training and expertise, command and control, procedures, Army watercraft systems, funding, and repair challenges.

Fishbone diagram of root causes affecting Army watercraft logistics support
Source artifact 03 / Root-cause fishbone

Step 5 / Develop Countermeasures

Countermeasures by root cause

01

GCSS action repository

Capture service plans, shop stock, maintenance actions, and internal SOPs in the 5th LOG Dashboard.

02

Internal regulations and guides

Document the current support process and maintain a running list of friction points for command review.

03

Government service agreements

Establish support paths with Army, Navy, Air Force, and regional logistics organizations.

04

Cost capture

Capture non-standard parts, services, fuel, and other external costs in GCSS.

05

Shop stock

Develop roughly 1,400 line items from recurring failures and senior engineer knowledge.

Table connecting root causes to specific maintenance countermeasures
Source artifact 04 / Countermeasure matrix

Detailed action plan

Completed Internal support guides and a running list of logistics friction points.

Completed Regional support agreements and contracting paths with Army, Navy, and Air Force organizations.

Completed GCSS cost capture for non-standard parts, services, fuel, and other external costs.

Completed Approximately 1,400 shop-stock line items developed and ordered.

Ongoing at closeout Service plans, GCSS repository work, internal SOPs, and VSO training.

Step 7 / Monitor Results

Maintenance request results

1,000+

GCSS notifications captured after implementation began in October 2024.

~1,400

shop-stock line items developed from recurring demand and senior engineer knowledge.

Shared intake

maintenance requests routed to an owner, tracked with their files, and closed into GCSS.

Maintenance request tracker showing requests routed by status and owner
Source artifact 05 / Maintenance request workflow

Step 8 / Standardize & Share Project Success

A3 Project Storyboard

A3 project storyboard summarizing the Lean Leader maintenance project
Source artifact 06 / Final A3 project storyboard
← Back to projects